Projectexample.com

Overview Action Plan

Understand

What Buyers Ask AI

Improve

Reporting

/Demo/Compare

Demo data Create project

Library Compare Schedules

Compare · audits

audit-2 to audit-1

GEO score improved by 8 points from Aug 2, 2026 to Aug 9, 2026; keep focus on the remaining open findings. Five changes detected, five improvements.

Swap Open report

Prior runCurrent run

Prior run

70

composite GEO

audit-2 · Aug 2

★ This run

78

composite GEO

audit-1 · Aug 9

Citability

Prior

0

Current

0

Changes11 differences

Improved

Brand

Composite sub-score

62 → 69+7

Improved

E-E-A-T

Composite sub-score

69 → 72+3

Improved

Technical

Composite sub-score

83 → 84+1

Improved

Schema

Composite sub-score

68 → 76+8

Improved

Platform

Composite sub-score

68 → 73+5

Same

Homepage answer blocks are weaker than the overall score suggests

High severity · Citability

Same

Several product and resource sections are too fragmentary for AI extraction

Medium severity · Citability

Same

Structured data is present but entity linking is incomplete

Medium severity · Schema

Same

Third-party brand authority signals are still thin

Medium severity · Brand

Same

llms.txt is valid but could be more complete

Low severity · Platform

Same

Technical foundation is strong with one policy gap

Low severity · Technical